Self-reproduction as an autonomous process of growth and reorganization in fully abiotic, artificial and synthetic cells

Sai Krishna Katla, Chenyu Lin, and Juan Pérez-Mercader

PNAS 122 (22) e2412514122

Self-reproduction is one of the most fundamental features of natural life. This study introduces a biochemistry-free method for creating self-reproducing polymeric vesicles. In this process, nonamphiphilic molecules are mixed and illuminated with green light, initiating polymerization into amphiphiles that self-assemble into vesicles. These vesicles evolve through feedback between polymerization, degradation, and chemiosmotic gradients, resulting in self-reproduction. As vesicles grow, they polymerize their contents, leading to their partial release and their reproduction into new vesicles, exhibiting a loose form of heritable variation. This process mimics key aspects of living systems, offering a path for developing a broad class of abiotic, life-like systems.

Read the full article at: www.pnas.org

The pivot penalty in research

Ryan Hill, Yian Yin, Carolyn Stein, Xizhao Wang, Dashun Wang & Benjamin F. Jones
Nature (2025)

Scientists and inventors set the direction of their work amid evolving questions, opportunities and challenges, yet the understanding of pivots between research areas and their outcomes remains limited1,2,3,4,5. Theories of creative search highlight the potential benefits of exploration but also emphasize difficulties in moving beyond one’s expertise6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. Here we introduce a measurement framework to quantify how far researchers move from their existing work, and apply it to millions of papers and patents. We find a pervasive ‘pivot penalty’, in which the impact of new research steeply declines the further a researcher moves from their previous work. The pivot penalty applies nearly universally across science and patenting, and has been growing in magnitude over the past five decades. Larger pivots further exhibit weak engagement with established mixtures of prior knowledge, lower publication success rates and less market impact. Unexpected shocks to the research landscape, which may push researchers away from existing areas or pull them into new ones, further demonstrate substantial pivot penalties, including in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The pivot penalty generalizes across fields, career stage, productivity, collaboration and funding contexts, highlighting both the breadth and depth of the adaptive challenge. Overall, the findings point to large and increasing challenges in effectively adapting to new opportunities and threats, with implications for individual researchers, research organizations, science policy and the capacity of science and society as a whole to confront emergent demands.

Read the full article at: www.nature.com

Blaise Agüera y Arcas: Computing, Life, and Intelligence

In the mid-20th century, Alan Turing and John von Neumann developed the theoretical underpinnings of computer science, neuroscience, and AI. They also founded the field of theoretical biology, showing how living systems must necessarily be computational in order to grow, heal, and reproduce. Recent experiments by Blaise Agüera y Arcas’ team at Google have drawn new connections between theoretical biology and computer science, showing how “digital life” can evolve in a purely random universe. Such artificial life doesn’t evolve the way Darwinian evolutionary theory usually presumes, through random mutation and selection, but rather through symbiogenesis, wherein small replicating entities merge into progressively bigger ones. This may be the creative engine behind biological evolution too. In this lecture, Agüera y Arcas will describe how symbiosis explains both life’s origins and its increasing complexity. He’ll also draw connections to social intelligence theories, which suggest that similar symbioses have powered intelligence explosions in humanity’s lineage and those of other big-brained species. Finally, he’ll argue that both modern human intelligence and AI are best understood through this symbiotic lens.

Watch at: www.youtube.com

Evidence of equilibrium dynamics in human social networks evolving in time

Miguel A. González-Casado, Andreia Sofia Teixeira & Angel Sánchez 
Communications Physics volume 8, Article number: 227 (2025)

How do networks of social relationships evolve over time? This study addresses the lack of longitudinal analyses of social networks grounded in mathematical modelling. We analyse a dataset tracking the social interactions of 900 individuals over four years. Despite shifts in individual relationships, the macroscopic structure of the network remains stable, fluctuating within predictable bounds. We link this stability to the concept of equilibrium in statistical physics. Specifically, we show that the probabilities governing link dynamics are stationary over time, and that key network features align with equilibrium predictions. Moreover, the dynamics also satisfy the detailed balance condition. This equilibrium persists despite ongoing turnover, as individuals join, leave, and shift connections. This suggests that equilibrium arises not from specific individuals but from the balancing act of human needs, cognitive limits, and social pressures. Practically, this equilibrium simplifies data collection, supports methods relying on single network snapshots (like Exponential Random Graph Models), and aids in designing interventions for social challenges. Theoretically, it offers insights into collective human behaviour, revealing how emergent properties of complex social systems can be captured by simple mathematical models.

Read the full article at: www.nature.com