Month: June 2026

Jagged Intelligence The dangerous unknowns at the heart of LLMs

Melanie Mitchell

A new term has been coined to describe AI in its current form: “jagged intelligence.” The term captures the fact that the landscape of AI capabilities is profoundly uneven: the tools demonstrate excellent abilities on certain problems but surprising failures on other similar problems. For humans, one kind of skill can often predict abilities at similar skills; this is not the case in the jagged landscape of AI. Last fall, Ilya Sutskever, a cofounder of OpenAI, argued that there are no easy fixes to this problem: “These models somehow just generalize dramatically worse than people. It’s a very fundamental thing.”

Read the full article at: yalereview.org

The Tone of Awareness: Topic, Sentiment, and Toxicity Maps During Mental Health Month on TikTok

Henrique Ferraz de Arruda, Andreia Sofia Teixeira, Pranay Gundala Reddy, Anindya Mondal, Kleber Andrade Oliveira, Filipi Nascimento Silva

Despite raising concerns about the mental health effects associated with the usage of TikTok, little is known about how related content is framed by creators and received by audiences. We collect the content of 28,341 TikTok videos and 80,130 comments from Mental Health Awareness Month (May) in 2023 and 2024 via the TikTok Research API, and study how the tone of awareness varies across topics and years. We characterize “tone” as the emotional and interpersonal framing of mental health discourse, operationalized through sentiment and toxicity measures. We extract topics from video text using BERTopic and log-odds keywords, then quantify topic-conditioned sentiment (XLM-T) and toxicity (Detoxify) separately for video transcriptions and comments. Sentiment captures the affective valence of content, while toxicity reflects the presence of harmful or abusive language. We find a stable set of recurring themes across years, spanning clinical conditions, emotional disclosure, self-care, and campaign-oriented content, with engagement highly skewed toward a small subset of topics. All sentiment and toxicity analyses are computed separately for video content and comments, allowing us to distinguish between content production and audience reception. Sentiment in videos is often negative for emotionally charged topics, while comments tend to shift toward more mixed or positive polarity, especially for suicide prevention. Toxicity is low in median overall, but exhibits longer-tailed outliers in comments than in videos that are more pronounced in comments and concentrated in specific topics (e.g., “Duet”, “Suicide Prevention”, and “Psychisch”). Overall, our results provide a topic-level decomposition of mental health discourse on TikTok during awareness-month campaigns.

Read the full article at: arxiv.org

Algorithmic bottlenecks in evolution: Genetic code, symbolic language, and the Great Filter hypothesis

Mikhail Prokopenko, Nihat Ay, Angelica Breviario, Roland M. Crocker, Paul C. W. Davies, Pauline Davies, Darren Dougan, Roland Fletcher, Michael Harré, Marcus G. Heisler, Zdenka Kuncic, Geraint F. Lewis, Ori Livson, Vivienne Reiner, Jaime Ruiz Serra

The Great Filter hypothesis proposes that the emergence of technological societies capable of interstellar travel depends on a small number of exceptionally hard and highly improbable steps. Traditional versions of this hypothesis enumerate such “hard steps” along the trajectory from inanimate matter to complex technological societies, but diverge in their explanations for why these particular steps should be so improbable. The theory of Major Evolutionary Transitions also faces challenges in identifying which steps should be considered universally “hard” across different evolutionary pathways. In contrast, we argue that two deeply structural obstacles dominate the evolutionary landscape: the coding threshold associated with the origin of the genetic code, and the language threshold associated with the emergence of symbolic communication. We examine the developmental precursors of both transitions and analyze the underlying algorithmic bottlenecks: points at which evolving systems separate code from function, while entangling them within information hierarchies. Using a game-theoretic analysis of coupled signaling and coordination dynamics, we then argue that the corresponding multichannel games exhibit unstable equilibria that render the transitions intrinsically difficult. We conjecture that the so-called Great Filter is best understood not as a sequence of isolated improbable events, but as a nested structure of tangled information hierarchies. Under this interpretation, the rarity of advanced societies follows from the difficulty of crossing these coding thresholds in a competitive noisy environment. This perspective reframes the Great Filter as an algorithmic property of evolving systems, highlighting why only a vanishingly small fraction of life may ever traverse the path toward technological societies capable of interstellar travel.

Read the full article at: arxiv.org