Investigation of regional variations in CO2 growth rates : Integrating Emission Inventories and Atmospheric Observations
Yogesh Bali, Darja Cvetković, Juan Gancio, Adrián Gutiérrez-Arroyo, Sofia Vazquez Alferez, Xuan Tung Vu, Jin Yan, Pietro Zgaga, Fakhteh Ghanbarnejad, Nasrin Mostafavi Pak
Atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) growth rates reflects the combined influence of anthropogenic emissions, biospheric carbon exchange, and climate variability. While climate mitigation is primarily evaluated using bottom-up emission inventories within political boundaries, there is a need to validate these emission reductions using atmospheric measurements. Here, we present a global top-down analysis of atmospheric CO2 growth rates using CAMS atmospheric CO2 reanalysis, EDGAR anthropogenic emissions, GOSIF dataset and the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) as a measures of biospheric activity, to quantify the relative influence of human and natural drivers. We find that atmospheric CO2 growth rate varies substantially across space and time but is dominated by natural carbon-cycle processes and global background trends. Anthropogenic emission signals are frequently masked by natural variability, making regional top-down detection of human emission changes difficult. The COVID-19 emission reductions in 2020, despite occurring during a neutral ENSO year, were not consistently reflected in regional atmospheric CO2 growth rates, highlighting the dominant roles of biospheric dynamics and atmospheric transport. Using unsupervised clustering and persistence analysis, we identify five characteristic carbon-cycle regimes. Spatial averaging removes much of the regional variability, leaving large-scale climate as the dominant control in most regimes. The active biosphere is the main exception, where strong biogenic signals persist, underscoring the critical role of tropical forests in shaping atmospheric CO2 variability.

Read the full article at: arxiv.org

Subhendu Bhandary, Federico Carucci, Christos Charalambous, Francesca Dilisante, Ksenia Dvorkina, Anna Garbo, Jiaqi Liang, Riccardo Vasellini, Francesco Bertolotti

LLMs agents are increasingly used in multi-agent settings, yet their behaviour in sustainability games remains largely unexplored. This work investigates whether lying can emerge among LLM agents in a competitive sustainability game in which agents are informed that common resources can regenerate, although regeneration does not actually occur. We develop an agent-based model of a sustainability game in which agents manage industrial, military, and ecological resources, and interact through a network. LLM agents can observe neighbours’ status, declare future attacks, receive permission to lie, and access reputation information, while rule-based agents provide an interpretable behavioural baseline. The results show that neighbour information strongly changes system dynamics, increasing attacks while improving biosphere retention and coexistence. Also, the presence of future declarations reduce extinction risk without suppressing conflict. Behaviourally, deception emerges even when agents are not explicitly allowed to lie, and explicit permission mainly increases bluffing and diversion rather than direct backstabbing. Finally, the presence of reputation memory and information about the current biosphere level reduces system ecological depletion. These findings suggest that deception can arise as an emergent behaviour in LLM-agent systems and that communication between LLM-agents could support sustainability while dealing with risk.

Read the full article at: arxiv.org

Isabela Burattini Freire, Hongryol Cha, Irina Epure, Sara Filippini, Karan K.H. Manjunatha, Chethan Kavaraganahalli Prasanna, Ivan Samoylenko, Niels Van Santen, Adarsh Prabhakaran, Guillermo Romero Moreno
Here we combine empirical network analysis with agent-based modelling to understand how different ways of structuring belief systems may affect the polarisation drive, and how the diversity of belief systems in Europe may result in different polarisation trajectories. Using the 2016 European Social Survey, we infer belief networks across 23 European countries via a Bayesian algorithm, revealing that belief systems are predominantly organised around immigration, LGBT rights, and economic interventionism, reflecting the influence of populist discourse across the continent. We further verify a Western-Eastern divide across the national belief networks: in Western European countries, left-right self-identification is a more reliable predictor of broader belief alignment, whereas in Eastern Europe this relationship breaks down. By applying these empirical belief networks into a sociologically grounded agent-based model, we further show that polarisation is amplified by high individual belief rigidity and low susceptibility to social influence, and that cross-country differences in polarisation levels mirror the same geographic divide observed in belief network topology. These findings establish belief networks topologies as a structural driver of political polarisation, with implications for understanding and anticipating polarisation dynamics across diverse European contexts. We find that populations are not polarised when little attention is placed on maintaining internal coherence and polarisation levels are moderate when high attention is placed in both keeping internal coherence and agreement in beliefs with others.

Read the full article at: arxiv.org