R. Maria del Rio-Chanona, Ekkehard Ernst, Rossana Merola, Daniel Samaan, Ole Teutloff

Generative AI is altering work processes, task composition, and organizational design, yet its effects on employment and the macroeconomy remain unresolved. In this review, we synthesize theory and empirical evidence at three levels. First, we trace the evolution from aggregate production frameworks to task- and expertise-based models. Second, we quantitatively review and compare (ex-ante) AI exposure measures of occupations from multiple studies and find convergence towards high-wage jobs. Third, we assemble ex-post evidence of AI’s impact on employment from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), field experiments, and digital trace data (e.g., online labor platforms, software repositories), complemented by partial coverage of surveys. Across the reviewed studies, productivity gains are sizable but context-dependent: on the order of 20 to 60 percent in controlled RCTs, and 15 to 30 percent in field experiments. Novice workers tend to benefit more from LLMs in simple tasks. Across complex tasks, evidence is mixed on whether low or high-skilled workers benefit more. Digital trace data show substitution between humans and machines in writing and translation alongside rising demand for AI, with mild evidence of declining demand for novice workers. A more substantial decrease in demand for novice jobs across AI complementary work emerges from recent studies using surveys, platform payment records, or administrative data. Research gaps include the focus on simple tasks in experiments, the limited diversity of LLMs studied, and technology-centric AI exposure measures that overlook adoption dynamics and whether exposure translates into substitution, productivity gains, erode or increase expertise.

Read the full article at: arxiv.org

Georgii, Karelin and Nakajima, Kohei and Soto-Astorga, Enrique F. and Carr, Earnest and James, Mark and Froese, Tom

Synergy between stochastic noise and deterministic chaos is a canonical route to unpredictable behavior in nonlinear systems. This letter analyzes the origins and consequences of indeterminism that has recently appeared in leading Large Language Models (LLMs), drawing connections to open-endedness, precariousness, artificial life, and the problem of meaning. Computational indeterminism arises in LLMs from a combination of the non-associative nature of floating-point arithmetic and the arbitrary order of execution in large-scale parallel software-hardware systems. This low-level numerical noise is then amplified by the chaotic dynamics of deep neural networks, producing unpredictable macroscopic behavior. We propose that irrepeatable dynamics in computational processes lend them a mortal nature.
Irrepeatability might be recognized as a potential basis for genuinely novel behavior and agentive artificial intelligence and could be explicitly incorporated into system designs.
The presence of beneficial intrinsic unpredictability can then be used to evaluate when artificial computational systems exhibit lifelike autonomy.

Read the full article at: philsci-archive.pitt.edu

Eleonora Vitanza , Chiara Mocenni and Pietro De Lellis

In this paper, we introduce a novel Markovian model that describes the impact of egosyntonicity on emotion dynamics. We focus on the dominant current emotion and describe the time evolution of its valence, modelled as a binary variable, where 0 and 1 correspond to negative and positive valences, respectively. In particular, the one-step transition probabilities will depend on the external events happening in daily life, the attention the individual devotes to such events, and the egosyntonicity, modelled as the agreement between the current valence and the internal mood of the individual. A steady-state analysis shows that, depending on the model parameters, four classes of individuals can be identified. Two classes are somewhat expected, corresponding to individuals spending more (less) time in egosyntonicity experiencing positive valences for longer (shorter) times. Surprisingly, two further classes emerge: the self-deluded individuals, where egosyntonicity is associated to a prevalence of negative valences, and the troubled happy individuals, where egodystonicity is associated to positive valences. These findings are aligned with the literature showing that, even if egosyntonicity typically has a positive impact in the short term, it may not always be beneficial in the long run.

Read the full article at: royalsocietypublishing.org

Laurent Hébert-Dufresne, Juniper Lovato, Giulio Burgio, James P. Gleeson, S. Redner, and P. L. Krapivsky

Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 087401

Models of how things spread often assume that transmission mechanisms are fixed over time. However, social contagions—the spread of ideas, beliefs, innovations—can lose or gain in momentum as they spread: ideas can get reinforced, beliefs strengthened, products refined. We study the impacts of such self-reinforcement mechanisms in cascade dynamics. We use different mathematical modeling techniques to capture the recursive, yet changing nature of the process. We find a critical regime with a range of power-law cascade size distributions with nonuniversal scaling exponents. This regime clashes with classic models, where criticality requires fine-tuning at a precise critical point. Self-reinforced cascades produce critical-like behavior over a wide range of parameters, which may help explain the ubiquity of power-law distributions in empirical social data.

Read the full article at: link.aps.org