Why Did the Universe Create Life? With David Krakauer

What is life? What is intelligence? What is… complexity? Neil deGrasse Tyson and co-hosts Chuck Nice and Gary O’Reilly learn how complexity science, chaos theory, and emergence could be the key to understanding our place in the universe with David Krakauer, president of the Santa Fe Institute and professor in complex systems.

Watch at: www.youtube.com

Messengers: breaking echo chambers in collective opinion dynamics with homophile

Mohsen Raoufi, Heiko Hamann & Pawel Romanczuk
npj Complexity volume 2, Article number: 28 (2025)

Collective estimation is a variant of collective decision-making where agents reach consensus on a continuous quantity through social interactions. Achieving precise consensus is complex due to the co-evolution of opinions and the interaction network. While homophilic networks may facilitate estimation in well-connected systems, disproportionate interactions with like-minded neighbors lead to the emergence of echo chambers and prevent consensus. Our agent-based simulations confirm that, besides limited exposure to attitude-challenging opinions, seeking reaffirming information entrap agents in echo chambers. To overcome this, agents can adopt a stubborn state (Messengers) that carries data and connects clusters by physically transporting their opinion. We propose a generic approach based on a Dichotomous Markov Process, which governs probabilistic switching between behavioral states and generates diverse collective behaviors. We study a continuum between task specialization (no switching), to generalization (slow or rapid switching). Messengers help the collective escape local minima, break echo chambers, and promote consensus.

Read the full article at: www.nature.com

Anticipatory Agents in Causal Bubbles: Reconciling Quantum Bayesianism, Rosen’s Anticipatory Systems, and Pragmatic Constructivism 

Michael Lissack

This paper presents a unified theoretical framework that reconciles four apparently disparate approaches: Quantum Bayesianism (QBism), Robert Rosen’s theory of Anticipatory Systems, the causal bubbles interpretation of quantum mechanics, and pragmatic constructivism through Hans Vaihinger’s philosophy of ‘as if.’ We demonstrate that these frameworks converge on a fundamental insight: reality emerges from a relational causal structure-the pattern of influences that determine what can affect what-rather than from external observation. The QBist agent exemplifies a Rosen Anticipatory System operating within a causal bubble, wherein the quantum wave function serves as a heuristic fiction-an ‘as if’ construct-used for anticipatory modeling within the agent’s architecture rather than for ontological description. This synthesis resolves longstanding quantum paradoxes, provides a naturalized account of final causality, and extends to encompass human cognition and artificial intelligence as distinct instantiations of the same anticipatory pattern. We argue that physical laws function as normative standards for coherent anticipation that acquire constraining force through selective pressure, and that this relational ontology bridges quantum physics, theoretical biology, epistemology, and cognitive science, dissolving apparent conflicts between these domains into perspectives on a shared structure.

Read the full article at: papers.ssrn.com

CfP: Variational, Nonequilibrium, and Optimization Principles of the Coevolution of Structure and Dynamics in Complex Systems

Complex systems fascinate because of the way dynamic microscopic interactions give rise to striking, often unexpected macroscopic structures: convection cells in fluids, patterns in ecosystems, networks in societies, and organization in biology. What unites these diverse examples is the deep link between how the agents in systems move and what structure emerges. While diverse approaches have been proposed, in addition, a unifying language may lie in variational principles and optimal control in stochastic and dissipative regimes which can offer a powerful language for understanding this interplay.

Action principles are among the most unifying ideas in science: from Lagrangian mechanics to quantum field theory, they describe how nature selects pathways. The stochastic-dissipative extensions of the principle of least action in the form of path integrals, such as by Onsager-Machlup and more recent versions provide a natural framework for describing how agents and processes, obeying fundamental physical laws, select the most probable and efficient pathways under constraints. These pathways not only govern system dynamics but also generate—and are constrained by—emergent structures. Feedback between dynamics and structure thus shapes evolution, with frozen accidents and historical contingencies balanced against tendencies toward action-efficient configurations. If dynamics select the most probable, efficient pathways, then structure itself may be seen as the lasting imprint of such pathways. Can such principles also help explain the emergence of complexity?

This Collection aims to gather theoretical, computational, and empirical contributions that advance the use of variational principles to explain and predict structure–dynamics interplay in complex systems. By doing so, we hope to move toward general non-equilibrium thermodynamics capable of grounding complexity science in physics while connecting to diverse domains of application. Contributions are welcome across disciplines, from mathematics and physics to biology, engineering, and social sciences. Themes may include, but are not limited to:

  • Stochastic and dissipative formulations of variational principles.
  • Path integrals and optimal control.
  • Structure formation in non-equilibrium thermodynamics.
  • Agent-based simulations and computational models.
  • Empirical case studies from physical, chemical, biological, or social systems.
  • Comparative perspectives with non-variational approaches.

The aim is to advance a physics-grounded framework for understanding how complex structures emerge and persist under dynamic constraints. The objective of this Collection is to foster dialogue among researchers working on different manifestations of the same fundamental questions: How do dynamics give rise to structure, how structure determines dynamics, and how can variational principles provide the key to understanding this process across scales and systems? Can variational pathways explain the emergence of complex structures from dynamics across nature and society?

More at: www.nature.com