Gülşah Akçakır, John C. Lang & P. J. Lamberson
npj Complexity volume 2, Article number: 35 (2025)

Collaboration enables groups to solve problems beyond the reach of their individual members in contexts ranging from research and development to high-energy physics. While communication networks play a pivotal role in group success, there is a longstanding debate on the optimal network topology for solving complex problems. Prior research reaches contradictory conclusions–some studies suggest networks that slow information transmission help maintain diversity, leading groups to explore more of the problem space and find better solutions in the long run, while others argue that networks that maximize communication efficiency allow groups to exploit known solutions, boosting overall performance. Many existing models assume that individuals use their network connections only to copy better-performing group members, but we show that such groups often perform worse than if individuals worked independently. Instead, our model introduces a crucial distinction: in addition to copying, individuals can actively collaborate, leveraging diverse perspectives to uncover solutions that would otherwise remain inaccessible. Our findings reveal that the optimal network structure depends on the balance between copying and collaboration. When copying dominates, inefficient, exploration-focused networks lead to better outcomes. However, when individuals primarily collaborate, highly connected, efficient networks win out. We also show how groups can reap the benefits of both strategies by employing a collaborate first-copy later heuristic in highly connected networks. The results offer new insights into how organizations should be structured to maximize problem-solving performance across different contexts.

Read the full article at: www.nature.com

Guido Caldarelli, Oriol Artime, Giulia Fischetti, Stefano Guarino, Andrzej Nowak, Fabio Saracco, Petter Holme, Manlio de Domenico
The boundaries between physical and social networks have narrowed with the advent of the Internet and its pervasive platforms. This has given rise to a complex adaptive information ecosystem where individuals and machines compete for attention, leading to emergent collective phenomena. The flow of information in this ecosystem is often non-trivial and involves complex user strategies from the forging or strategic amplification of manipulative content to large-scale coordinated behavior that trigger misinformation cascades, echo-chamber reinforcement, and opinion polarization. We argue that statistical physics provides a suitable and necessary framework for analyzing the unfolding of these complex dynamics on socio-technological systems. This review systematically covers the foundational and applied aspects of this framework. The review is structured to first establish the theoretical foundation for analyzing these complex systems, examining both structural models of complex networks and physical models of social dynamics (e.g., epidemic and spin models). We then ground these concepts by describing the modern media ecosystem where these dynamics currently unfold, including a comparative analysis of platforms and the challenge of information disorders. The central sections proceed to apply this framework to two central phenomena: first, by analyzing the collective dynamics of information spreading, with a dedicated focus on the models, the main empirical insights, and the unique traits characterizing misinformation; and second, by reviewing current models of opinion dynamics, spanning discrete, continuous, and coevolutionary approaches. In summary, we review both empirical findings based on massive data analytics and theoretical advances, highlighting the valuable insights obtained from physics-based efforts to investigate these phenomena of high societal impact.

Read the full article at: arxiv.org